Wednesday, August 19, 2015
To Kill a Mockingbird, another go round
To Kill a Mockingbird was shot in 1960-1 in B&W. It’s
remarkable how one brings who one is and one’s life experience to
what one reads and watches. Every time I watch a movie such as this I
make new discoveries. The opening credits show Scout outlining the
title by rubbing a crayon over a woodcut followed by continued
doodles on the same sheet of lined paper. As the credits begin the
box of treasures she opens is Jem’s which seems rather odd. A
series of those childhood keepsakes are scrolled past as the credits
appear. Many are gifts left them by ‘Boo’ Radley. The carved
figures, a broken pocket watch, a whistle, various marbles....
Atticus Finch is a remarkable man who in the first place allows his
children to call him by his first name. He treats everyone including
his black housekeeper/nanny as equals and in all his dealings never
raises his voice. Just why his wife died when Scout was two I don’t
remember reading. Two scenes stand out for me. Jem’s wide-eyed
wonder when a father who refuses to allow him to have a gun is asked
by the Sheriff as the best shot in the county to shoot a rabid dog.
It harkens to a past to which we are never privy. And the second
involves Scout defusing the lynch mob by asking one of the ring
leaders to say hello to his son Walter for her. The innocence of
youth.
The miss-carriage of justice which is at the centre of this tome is
matched by the judicial discretion shown by Sheriff Tate in the
closing scenes. The role of Calpurnia, the children’s governess and
housekeeper in shaping their lives and attitudes with their father’s
approval cannot be understated. These children are truly colourblind
even if their neighbours aren’t. I only wish the injustice and
institutional racism this story serves to spotlight were a historical
artifact. The movie is not only one of the ten best of 1962 but of
all time.
2015
I just rewatched this movie in light of the fact that I'd just
finished reading Harper Lee's Go Set a Watchman. There has been a lot
of shock expressed about the role of Atticus Finch in the latest
book. I would remind anyone who is looking at that book in light of
the movie I've just seen that the movie is told from the naive point
of view of a 6-year-old girl. Atticus defends his client against a
white society that has falsely accused him. If the man we meet
decades later belongs to a white supremacist organization he wouldn't
be the first person to join such a group the better to keep track of
what his neighbours are up to. In Ontario Environmentalist groups
divide up the political parties among themselves and each join one
for much the same purpose.